subject
History, 28.01.2020 08:31 tylermdons

Read chief justice warren’s decision from the miranda case.

the entire thrust of police interrogation . . was to put the defendant in such an emotional state as to impair his capacity for rational judgment. . [t]he choice on his part to speak to the police—was not made knowingly.

what did chief justice warren say about how miranda’s confession was made?

a. miranda was aware of his rights when he made his confession.

b. miranda incriminated himself intentionally and knowingly.

c. miranda was unaware of his rights but his confession could be used.

d. miranda incriminated himself without knowing that he could refuse to do so.

ansver
Answers: 1

Another question on History

question
History, 21.06.2019 14:00
What were the differing views of the presidency held by the framers?
Answers: 3
question
History, 22.06.2019 06:20
What is one result of the supreme courts decision in the mccullough v maryland case
Answers: 1
question
History, 22.06.2019 10:30
The first time that unmanned underwater "gliders" were used by ocean scientists to respond to an oil spill was after the
Answers: 2
question
History, 22.06.2019 14:50
How was the rise of totalitarianism in japan relate to its expansionist foreign policy in the 20th centruy
Answers: 2
You know the right answer?
Read chief justice warren’s decision from the miranda case.

the entire thrust of police...
Questions
question
Business, 05.05.2020 09:49
Questions on the website: 13722361