I’m doing a practice and i’m stuck on this.
federalists and anti-federalists made different arguments about the new government. drag each argument to the correct group
i believe that federalists wanted a strong central government.
i believe that anti-federalists didn’t want the federal government to be to powerful.
i’m just stuck on who thinks direct democracy is best and who thinks republicanism is best.
if someone could that would be great : )

Federalists:

A stronger national government.

Needs the new Constitution.

Anti-Federalists:

The national government shouldn't be too powerful.

The new Constitution gives too much power to the national government.

Explanation:

These are the answers to question 28 l on the History semester exam review for connexus.

they were unable to pay their debts

the east coast has nothing to do with the dust bowl, the dust bowl killed a full year's worth of crops in seconds, and with the dust on the land, the land would be worthless.   furthermore the farmers couldn't  get  out of their houses due to the dust so when the bank came to collect money, farmers couldn't  pay it

d) he bring down boss tweed and tammany hall.