subject
History, 12.09.2019 11:10 fhishy11

In federalist paper no. 51, madison argues the constitution would protect the rights of the minority, is he justified in believing that “a coalition of a majority of the whole society could seldom take place on any other principles than those of justice and the general good? ”

ansver
Answers: 3

Another question on History

question
History, 21.06.2019 21:00
Chief justice earl warren stated, “separate educational facilities are inherently unequal.” what did the use of “inherently” imply about segregation? 1/ by its very definition, it cannot be equal. 2/ it is an integral part of american society. 3/ based on its meaning, separation is a natural inclination. 4/ it was intended to be a state right, not a national mandate.
Answers: 1
question
History, 22.06.2019 06:30
Why did louis xvi call a meeting of the estates-general in 1789? how long had it been since such a meeting had been called?
Answers: 2
question
History, 22.06.2019 07:00
Why do you think alexander hamilton wanted to pay back the bonds from the confederation government
Answers: 3
question
History, 22.06.2019 08:20
What did hiram rhodes revels argue for in the senate
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
In federalist paper no. 51, madison argues the constitution would protect the rights of the minority...
Questions
question
English, 02.07.2019 09:20
question
Mathematics, 02.07.2019 09:20
Questions on the website: 13722362