Ahistorical argument is a stance or viewpoint that:
a. does not reflect a historian's personal biases.
b. promotes a certain perspective on past events.
c. attempts to refute possible criticisms of a claim.
o
d. summarizes another historian's conclusions.
submit

promotes a certain perspective on past events.

Explanation:

which time period is this? or is this story fictional, i'm going to need more info to answer this question

the supreme court can hear any case it wishes as long as four justices agree to hear it.

hope this , give me brainliest answer =j