Pleeaasssee hellp ive been having a mental breakdown about this all i mostly need with # and : ): ): )): : (: (: (: (
read the passage then answer the questions.
1. source? - (who wrote it)
2. occasion? - (letter, diary, speech, ect)
3. audience? - (whom was it meant for)
4. purpose? - (why was it written)
5. write a 3 sentace summary of what is was about.

Sparta was a warrior society in ancient Greece that reached the height of its power after defeating rival city-state Athens in the Peloponnesian War (431-404 B.C.). Spartan culture was centered on loyalty to the state and military service. At age 7, Spartan boys entered a rigorous state-sponsored education, military training and socialization program. Known as the Agoge, the system emphasized duty, discipline and endurance. Although Spartan women were not active in the military, they were educated and enjoyed more status and freedom than other Greek women. Because Spartan men were professional soldiers, all manual labor was done by a slave class, the Helots. Despite their military prowess, the Spartans’ dominance was short-lived: In 371 B.C., they were defeated by Thebes at the Battle of Leuctra, and their empire went into a long period of decline.

This is all the information I've gathered from the summary of all that I've researched. Hope it helps you. Just separate the points and write down accordingly.

economic competition is inefficient and wasteful.good luck

explanation:

option d is correct. corroborated sources of historical evidence   is necessary to validate a claim about an event in history.

historians tend to use written sources, but audio and visual materials as well as artifacts are important objects that supply information to modern historians.

historical sources are usually divided into two categories: primary and secondary sources. depending on the historian's intent, some sources shift their designation. determining what type of sources toimplement, and the level of credibility and reliability of those sources, is a significant step in critical thinking for the historian.

explanation: