Explain which constitutional principle this scenario illustrates. what evidence led you to that conclusion principle this scenario illustrates. what evidence led you to that conclusion?
scenario:
a high school student in san antonio, texas, who brought an unloaded handgun to school was charged with violating the gun-free school zones act of 1990. the student challenged the charge, claiming that congress did not have the power to override state law within public schools. in the 1995 case united v. lopez, the supreme court ruled that congress did not have the power to regulate public schools. instead, the court found that the power belonged to individual states.

Federalism

Explanation:

This scenario illustrates Federalism as it provides a clear example of how shared sovereignty is applied. The main or central government delegates the responsibility to the federal units, in this case Texas, to uphold the power to apply the adequate punishment or act in its own local proportions. The evidence itself was presented by the student, who reasonably pointed out the situation where there was a commandment coming from a higher stance to address a local matter, in this case, a public school, which was then overruled by the supreme court.

definitely a for sure. ill see and update if i get the answer

answer: a

explanation:  

stocks and bonds are the two main classes of assets investors use in their portfolios. stocks offer an ownership stake in a company, while bonds are akin to loans made to a company (a corporate bond) or other organization (like the u.s. treasury). in general, stocks are considered riskier and more volatile than bonds.

savings accounts are just money in a bank- they are insured by the fdic for up to 250,000.   very little risk

the average mutual fund holds hundreds of different securities, which means mutual fund shareholders gain important diversification at a low price. which means if one stock or bond drops it will have very little affect on the mutual fund - again very little risk