Writing a thesis that answers this question: what deeper lesson emerges after contrasting both items? (comparing the crucible by arthur miller to mccarthyism and the red scare in the 1950s)
sub-questions provided for brainstorming: (kinda want to answer the first one)
a. why and/or how people will abuse power when security becomes the primary concern over individual beliefs?
b. when, if ever, is it justified to sacrifice individual liberties for national security?
c. how does intolerance play the role of societal scapegoats?
d. what role do scapegoats play in conflict between individual liberties vs. national security?

descendants of muhammed

the industrial development of cities in the ruhr area in the nineteenth century is described. the research was based on english and german language sources. several factors that shaped growth and paths of the cities were categorized and analyzed. they are locations, resources, traditions, entrepreneurs, and technological developments. locations and resources were the most important among them; other factors may be regarded as consequences from locations and resources. among the cities, bochum, essen, gelsenkirchen, and dortmund had the richest resources and most favorable locations in the transportation network and grew to be the largest cities in the ruhr area near the end of the nineteenth century. riverside location was also a favorable factor for the development, as shown in the development of duisburg on the confluence of rhine and ruhr. resource distribution can explain the rise of textile industry, metallurgical industry, and coal and iron industries, and the northward progression of the mining industry. tradition was an important factor for cities such as krefeld, barmen, elberfeld, solingen, and remscheid, which experienced development based on their traditions through the nineteenth century. various entrepreneurs exerted influences within and beyond the local level over the ruhr area. technological development stimulated the northward progression of the mining industry and the deep connection between the coal and the iron industries.

the right answer is d

bye cutting off more workers so the graph can go back up