Ahistorian writes an essay on the united nations. she
claims that the united nations does not value african
countries because it did not attempt to stop a genocide
that took place in rwanda in 1994.
a reader trying to determine whether the historian's interpretation is valid
would most likely:
a
criticize the historian for having a personal bias against
international organizations.
o
b. cite the historian's essay when writing a book about the history of
the united nations
o
c. conduct research into rwandan history to learn about the causes
of the genocide.
o
d. evaluate the sources the historian cited to make sure they support
her conclusion

i believe it would influence their own way of understanding things. it shall be a foundation where they can draw or start an argument.   historians are also  scientists that  have their tools of analysis and expertise to unlock a variety of difficulties such as relationships of man, origin, politics, economy, and culture. based on facts and understanding on these areas, they may shade light to extract ideas and develop options to validate a hypothesis or debunk it.

the presidential debate between carter and reagan in 1980 was ranked among the highest ratings achieved by any television program in the previous decade (the 1970s). carter focused on portraying reagan as a "war hawk" and a "right-wing radical", which could be considered as comments with no factual evidence. however, reagan openly criticized medicare and social security benefits, stating the fact that national debt was approaching $ 1 trillion. these arguments, plus his closing remarks, in which he asked viewers to question themselves "if it is easier for them to buy things in the store or find employment than 4 years ago", were key to him win the election by a vast margin during that year.

e."