Is bible history? how do we evaluate its historicity? 2. what do we know of the context of the time and what is the rule of historical investigation? 3. how do scholars treat accounts of miracles or statements about (a) god’s will? 4. what are the limitations of the text in regard to its authors? 5. what are the limitations of modern readers when they encounter biblical texts? 6. what do we know about worship in the ancient israelite world? 7. what do we use as sources to understand ancient israelite practice? is there uniformity of practice? 8. what does bowley mean when he says: it is reductionist to speak of the israelite way of thinking, israel’s view of god or on anything else.

The bible was written about 2,000 years ago so it could be counted as history. The bible was written by God's words, but God doesn't have an age so it doesn't count as history. The Bible is the Beginning, Middle, and End.

Explanation:

Sorry if that doesn't help,

option d is correct. corroborated sources of historical evidence   is necessary to validate a claim about an event in history.

historians tend to use written sources, but audio and visual materials as well as artifacts are important objects that supply information to modern historians.

historical sources are usually divided into two categories: primary and secondary sources. depending on the historian's intent, some sources shift their designation. determining what type of sources toimplement, and the level of credibility and reliability of those sources, is a significant step in critical thinking for the historian.

explanation:

well this is going to be a long answer lol ok so the visigoths were a branch of the goths who frequently raided rome, uh the hunas attacked the guptas a lot and weakened them, uuhm of course the romans used math and science in there every day lives i mean they had a whole empire to run, and rome was split into east and west by a general named diocletian. hope this you! : )