subject
History, 01.10.2019 02:30 libertycooper

Can some me question 18

according to international law of europe in the late 18th century, there were only three ways that britain could take possession of another country. what were they?

a) if the country was uninhabited, britain could claim and settle that country. in this case, it could claim ownership of the land.

b) if the country was already inhabited, britain could ask for permission from the indigenous people to use some of their land. in this case, britain could purchase land for its own use but could not steal the land of the indigenous people.

c) if the country was already inhabited, they could ignore the indigenous people on the land so long as they did not challenge their settlement.

d) if the country was inhabited, britain could take over the country by invasion and conquest; in other words, defeat that country in war. however, even after winning a war, britain would have to respect the rights of indigenous people.

e) if the country was already inhabited, they could ask the indigenous people on the land for permission to use some of their land. if the response was no, they then could use force to settle the land.

ansver
Answers: 2

Another question on History

question
History, 21.06.2019 16:50
Rivalries between european imperialist powers and the growth of european militaries contributed to which outcome in the early 20th century? o a. many european powers were eager to go to war with one another. o b. european states became less concerned about controlling overseas empires. o c. small countries became more willing to join powerful empires. o d. the alliance system that maintained a balance of power in europe broke down.
Answers: 2
question
History, 21.06.2019 21:00
Which was the cause of the rise of the persian empire?
Answers: 1
question
History, 21.06.2019 21:30
During the cold war, which of the following groups of countries would have all been"behind the iron curtain"
Answers: 2
question
History, 22.06.2019 02:20
What did this mean for dred scott? a.scott was not a citizen of the united states. b.scott was the property of the federal government. c.scott had no right to sue for his freedom in court. d.scott was considered the property of the slaveholding family.
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
Can some me question 18

according to international law of europe in the late 18th cent...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 18.06.2021 03:10
question
Mathematics, 18.06.2021 03:10
Questions on the website: 13722367