Historical context is the most important factor to consider when analyzing a historical narrative.

write a short response to either support or oppose the statement above. be sure to address the topic of historical context and methods used by miner and other scholars in your statement. provide evidence for your argument from the information in the article. your statement should be a minimum of three paragraphs.

The massacre at sand creek was an attack by a colorado militia on peaceful american indians. a colorado militia on a group of dakota warriors. american indians on peaceful white settlers. federal soldiers on a group of cheyenne warriors.

My latest book, fightin’, prose short fiction, is a combination. there’s nothing about being indian in there. just stories of people. why shouldn’t i write about non-indians? i don’t have to dress anybody in feathers." how does ortiz's use of language in this excerpt set an informal tone? a. by using contractions and sentence fragments, ortiz makes this part of the interview feel more familiar and casual. c. by using the term "indian" rather than "native american," ortiz makes this part of the interview feel more combative or hostile. b. by employing first-person pronouns, ortiz makes this part of the interview more solemn and pessimistic. d. by asking a rhetorical question, ortiz makes this part of the interview objectively and intentionally funny and lighthearted.

Which best describes the albany plan of union? it was a failed plan to eliminate the colonists’ right to vote.it was a failed plan to unite the american colonies.it was a failed plan to make the colonies independent from britain.it was a failed plan to strengthen individual colonial governments.?