Why were florida's pow camps kept secret from the
american public?
o pow camps benefited the us economy, which may
have been frowned upon.
unknown to many residents of the state even at the time,
over ten thousand german and italian prisoners of war
were kept in florida camps during the war. housed in a
system of camps throughout the state, the pows picked
vegetables, harvested sugar cane, cut pulpwood,
processed florida's massive fruit crop and even worked
as custodial workers at undermanned military
installations and miami resort hotels.
american military officials adhered to the provisions of
the 1929 geneva convention, which stipulated that
captives must receive the same food, clothing, and
housing as the troops of the home nation. one of the
reasons why the pows were kept secret was the fear that
americans might think they were being
"coddled"-especially when compared to allied prisoners
held in germany.
o pow camps were not allowed on us soil,
according to the geneva convention
o the prisoners were treated poorly, which went
against the geneva convention.
the prisoners were treated well, and there were
fears that the public would disapprove.

the covenant that god made with abraham was a unilateral (one-sided) promise from god to abraham.   apart from anything abraham did, god was promising that he was going to bring about a great nation from abraham's offspring, and that the messiah (meaning "the anointed one") would come from abraham's descendants, as one through whom the whole world would receive favor from god.   as god promised abraham, "through your offspring all nations on earth will be blessed" (genesis 22: 18).

the "new covenant" was announced by jesus of nazareth, who had asserted that he was the "son of david" (and descendant of abraham) that fulfilled those promises to abraham.   when jesus introduced the sacred meal that we now refer to as the lord's supper, as told his disciples in reference to the wine they drank, "this cup is the new covenant in my blood, which is poured out for you" (luke 22: 20).   this "new covenant" through jesus was also a unilateral (one-sided) covenant.   he gave himself in sacrifice for all people, without conditions attached.   as his friend and apostle john later wrote, "he is the atoning sacrifice for our sins, and not only for ours but also for the sins of the whole world" (1 john 2: 2).

so the covenant with abraham and the "new covenant" ushered in by jesus are, in essence, connected as one covenant -- because jesus was saying he was the one promised to abraham that fulfilled that covenant and brought blessing to the world.

negative economic effects of the russian people stronger alliances with britain and america strengthening of the russian monarchy