Did the spaniards ant the native americans regard gold with equal value.?

answer: interactions among europeans and native americans varied from place to place, and members of each nation forged relationships with indians in very different ways, depending on a variety of economic, social and political factors. while we should be mindful of this diversity, we can still make certain generalizations. few europeans considered native americans their equals, because of differences in religion, agricultural practice, housing, dress, and other characteristics that—to europeans—indicated native american inferiority. however, the french, spanish, and dutch sought profit through trade and exploitation of new world resources, and they knew that the native people would be important to their success. europeans also wanted to convert native americans to christianity. therefore, economic gain and religion were the two factors that most affected the dynamics of european and indigenous american relationships.

explanation:

which question?

explanation:

which question r u talking about?

the articles of confederation only set up the continental congress at the federal level. there were no executive or judicial branches except within the states. the states were allowed to keep every right that was not specifically given to congress. the bonding of the states was through a 'firm league of friendship' that best served as a defense agreement against invasion. states were not allowed to use taxes as a way to discourage treaties, and states were extremely limited in their dealings with foreign nations.

not many historians today talk about the strengths of the articles of confederation, likely because of how unpopular the document quickly became. the articles did set the legislative body, congress, as the highest power in the nation because of the fear of monarchy. congress had the sole power to declare war, assign treaties, entertain foreign relations, and operate post offices. disputes between states and territorial issues were to be brought to congress. the document also stipulated that canada was allowed to enter the union if they desired.

there were more weaknesses than strengths under the articles of confederation. the lack of power given to the continental congress strangled the federal government. the articles gave congress the power to pass laws but no power to enforce those laws. if a state did not support a federal law, that state could simply ignore it. congress had no power to levy taxes or regulate trade. without a federal court system or executive leader, there would be no way to enforce these laws, either. amending the articles of confederation would also require a unanimous decision, which would be extremely difficult.