subject
History, 23.10.2019 19:00 koryn4880

Why might people have objected to this plan based on
the constitution? check all that apply.
some historians have suggested the executive office of
the president has led to a more powerful presidency,
replacing policymaking functions that should rightly
belong to the cabinet. according to this line of thought,
the reorganization act of 1939 has given the president
too much power over an entire branch of government,
since most members of the executive office are appointed
directly by the president without being confirmed by the
senate.
the plan took away power belonging to the
cabinet.
the plan did not reorganize the branch.
the plan increased the powers of the presidency
the plan created less accountability to the senate
the plan eliminated presidential powers.

ansver
Answers: 3

Another question on History

question
History, 21.06.2019 23:30
15 points to the "charlemagne" section, what were the two policies that charlemagne implemented when he took the throne? what was the result of the policies and how did it impact his warriors?
Answers: 2
question
History, 21.06.2019 23:40
The tables shows information about two citied what can you infer about the temperature of these cities
Answers: 1
question
History, 22.06.2019 00:30
What was the national government’s biggest concern if facing a war, under the articles of confederation? the national government had no national military. the country had grown too large to defend with a small army. the states would not back the federal government. there was no way the states would pay for fighting a war.
Answers: 3
question
History, 22.06.2019 02:00
Why did the paris peace conference negotiations last over a year?
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
Why might people have objected to this plan based on
the constitution? check all that apply.<...
Questions
question
English, 18.11.2020 19:20
Questions on the website: 13722359