5. imagine you are a historian studying a battlefield journal written by a soldier
serving in world war i. describe the process of interpreting the information within
the journal, as well as how you would determine whether the evidence in the journal
is valid. (4 points)

option d is correct. corroborated sources of historical evidence   is necessary to validate a claim about an event in history.

historians tend to use written sources, but audio and visual materials as well as artifacts are important objects that supply information to modern historians.

historical sources are usually divided into two categories: primary and secondary sources. depending on the historian's intent, some sources shift their designation. determining what type of sources toimplement, and the level of credibility and reliability of those sources, is a significant step in critical thinking for the historian.

explanation:

what are the options?

got any answer choices?