Will give braniliest

this is an excerpt from the website world war i by high school student alexia dengbai :
i believe world war i was the most destructive war in history. millions were killed or injured, and cities were destroyed. people suffered greatly. there could never again be a war as destructive as world war i. that is why people called it the ''war to end all wars.''

which statement about the credibility of this source is most accurate ?

a. the source is credible because it contains more facts than opinions.
b. the source is not credible because it contains more opinions than facts.
c. the source is credible because the author is an expert on world war i.
d. the source is not credible because it does not contain the date of the war.

I believe the answer is B

Explanation:

First of all, it says “I believe” and this indicates and opinion. Another opinion is “there could never be a war as destructive as World War I”. Also, this text does not provide any citation or sources.

This is why this source cannot be credible :)

hope I helped,

please mark me as brainliest  

the graph shows the spread of railways in the 1800s.

based on the graph, the conclusion that can be drawn about germany is answer d)   by 1880, germany had more rail lines than great britain and russia.

monopolies  came to the united states with the colonial administration. the large-scale public works needed to make the new world hospitable to old world immigrants required large companies to carry them out. these companies were granted exclusive contracts for these works by the colonial administrators. even after the american revolution, many of these colonial holdovers still functioned due to the contracts and land

read more on -