How would you explain variations in the descriptions of what chinggis was like?

The different descriptions of Chinggis could have varied according to the perspective of the historians who depicted him. Keep in mind that Mongols built an empire which extended all the way across Eastern Europe to Siberia and Far East. Mongols conquered and expanded covering a large territory, therefore, it created a fearsome insight on Chinggis. Albeit some historians depicted him as a a barbarian, others were amazed by his leadership and might of command as a grat conqueror.

Explanation:

the conditions that made the byzantine empire vulnerable to attacks by the muslin turks were the sack of constantinople by western crusaders, the conquests of the sultanate of rum, presence of rival kingdoms and finally the set up of fiefdoms at the empire which were owned by the ghazis (turkish warriors).

hhghkkggcvbkkjvhkiuvvb