Why is it bad that a president can be elected without winning the popular vote? i'm writing an essay on abolishing the electoral college, and i need a little in wording why having a president who lost the majority of votes would be detrimental to the united states.

the  equal rights amendment  (era) states: "equality  of  rights  under the law shall not be denied or abridged by the united states or by any state on account of sex." congress first introduced the era in 1923, but the campaign for ratification took off in the 1960s during the  civil rightsmovement.

a widespread disease that killed many people

the split of the christian church

invasion from arab muslims

well we know that it was fought between america and the united kingdom based on that i assume people consider the second war of independence because brtiain and england (uk)   the uk is made up of england and i assume thats why it was considered that

i will need the answers to the problems. i took the test but cant remember the options. i would look up the questions that might .

for number 3, the answer is something about how they wanted to get sc to vote twords it, so they add the bill of rights or edited it.

for number 5, the answer is that it was even, they chose one side just as likely as they did the other.