How has the discovery of 5,300-year-old ötzi, the iceman, scientists in their knowledge? a- ötzi, the iceman, was as old as previously thought.
b- ötzi, the iceman, existed at a time when the climate was warm.
c- precise knowledge about his food and clothing is available.
d- humans from that period are exactly same as modern humans.

B. Otzi the iceman existed at a time when the climate was warm is the correct answer.

Explanation:

Otzi the icemen is the mummy of a man who lives about 5300 year ago, It was found by German hikers in the Schnalstal glacier near the border of Italy and Hungary. Otzi is Europe's oldest human mummy. Research has revealed that he had died due to injuries and cuts on his body. The mummy is believed to be 5300 years old. It revealed many facts about  the climate of Earth 5000 years ago. It gave insight into the warm interval that lasted 10,000 years ago because there are no glacial sediments to to study this period.

•an essay

•a mock-heroic epic  

•deals with cannibalism  

•introduces “sylphs” as guardian spirits  

•not a satire  

•written by daniel defoe

•written by alexander pope

•written by jonathan swift  

•criticizes the exploration of ireland  

•criticizes impulsive nature  

•criticizes the english upper class  

•playful tone  

•remorseful tone

•matter-of-fact tone  

“the rap of the lock”   written by alexander pope.

“a modest proposal”

it was certainly a debatable decision, mainly because it was based primarily on political - and not on legal or social - views. since the congress at that time was led by members of the republican party, and the territory that the tribes wanted to turn into an exclusively indian state was predominantly democratic, the proposal (as expressed in the constitution) did not succeed, but the constitution itself proved to be of crucial importance in the creation of the state of oklahoma, and, most importantly, it guaranteed the involvement of representatives of the indian tribes in the government of the future joint state.  

as a member of congress, i would have voted to ratify the constitution, or at least to have it tabled. ignoring it was an interested and partial decision.