The yazoo land act was passed by the georgia legislature to encourage settlement in lands west of where most people lived. it resulted, though, in a massive scandal. choose the items that correctly describe the scandal known as the yazoo land fraud. the yazoo land act was passed during the civil war. the act organized the sale of lands in areas that would become alabama and mississippi. georgians were angered by the sale because most of the land was purchased by foreign investors. the u. s. government eventually purchased the land affected by the yazoo act. as part of the settlement that ended the scandal, creek indians were to be removed from georgia.

it was not until 1606 that the virginia company of london got a contract from. on may 13, 1607, these first pilgrims chose the site of jamestown island as the. to make shares more attractive, the virginia company changed its attempt to sell something. the way of life would increment the country over.

a hypothesis is an expected answer to a question, usually based on some theory or prior research. hypothesis testing is a method of determining the viability of a hypothesis. let’s use the us presidential election as an example. there are many hypotheses (questions) about how people feel or whom they will vote for. the only way to know the 100% “truth” about the answers to these questions is to ask every single possible voter – something that is impossible, expensive, time consuming etc. instead, we take samples and use statistics to make “best guesses” about the answer to a particular hypothesis. we never know for sure if our conclusion is right at the time we accept/reject it, but these techniques, when used appropriately can get us close to the truth most of the time (which is a lot better than guessing, flipping coins or throwing darts to get answers).

the tricky part about hypothesis testing is that we have to think somewhat backwards about it – we have to test what is known as the “null hypothesis”. as an example, the hypothesis might be “obama is more popular than romney” while the null hypothesis is “there is no difference in popularity between obama and romney”. we focus on the null hypothesis because it tells us exactly what the expected value of our tests should be (obama popularity = romney popularity) and we can collect data and see if it comes out that way (see next section on “significance”). if it does, then we “accept the null hypothesis” and reject our original hypothesis. if the null hypothesis is disproven, we look at the data to see if our original hypothesis holds (obama> romney).

the answer is b! (apex)