subject
History, 19.11.2019 04:31 neariah24

How do historians synthesize evidence to draw conclusions?
o
a. they categorize primary and secondary sources.
o
b. they use evidence only from secondary sources.
o
c. they determine how multiple sources differ.
o
d. they rely only on eyewitness accounts.

ansver
Answers: 1

Another question on History

question
History, 21.06.2019 19:30
Augustine believed that god was all knowing and all powerful. he believed that in order for this to be true, god must directly control everything, meaning that we do not have or (two answers)
Answers: 3
question
History, 21.06.2019 23:30
Choose all that apply. from the lesson, which of the following can lead to an empire's collapse? the forming of other empires internal problems na poor economy no one wants to lead unhappy citizens
Answers: 1
question
History, 22.06.2019 02:30
Which statement in the passage best reflects sumer's opinion of the dred scott decision? a."i speak what cannot be denied." b."[the] judgment was sustained by a falsification of history." b."the opinion was more thoroughly abominable than anything history." i speak what cannot be denied when i declare that the opinion of the chief justice in the case of dred scott was more thoroughly abominable than anything of the kind in the history of courts. judicial baseness reached its lowest point on that occasion. you have not forgotten that terrible decision where a most unrighteous judgment was sustained by a falsification of history. -charles sumner, 1865
Answers: 3
question
History, 22.06.2019 06:00
Why did alexander go primarily east and south from macedonia and greece in his conquest
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
How do historians synthesize evidence to draw conclusions?
o
a. they categorize primary...
Questions
question
Health, 08.10.2019 13:30
question
Biology, 08.10.2019 13:30
question
Biology, 08.10.2019 13:30
question
Mathematics, 08.10.2019 13:30
Questions on the website: 13722366