subject
History, 19.11.2019 21:31 Raniel

Directions: match the ending sentence to the beginning sentences. copy the ending sentence and paste it to the correct beginning sentence.

beginning sentences:

minor parties are sometimes referred to as….

in 1912 the progressive party…

third parties hold beliefs…

some problems third parties have are…

the united states is one of a number of countries that have…

beginning sentences:
minor parties are sometimes referred to as….
in 1912 the progressive party…
third parties hold beliefs…
some problems third parties have are…
the united states is one of a number of countries that have…

ending of sentences:

major parties do not support.
the lack of financial support and little attention from newspapers and television.
third parties
nominated theodore roosevelt for president
a two party political system.

ansver
Answers: 3

Another question on History

question
History, 21.06.2019 18:00
Which of the following was not an effect of westward expansion? a. native american tribes suffered confinement on reservations. b. native americans learned new techniques of irrigation. c. many native americans died from the spread of disease. d. natural resources were depleted from misuse by white settlers.
Answers: 1
question
History, 21.06.2019 19:30
In the decision for dred scott vs.sanford, (1857) in which a slave petitioned for his freedom in a st. louis court, on the grounds that his owner had taken him into free territory, and thus he ought no longer be regarded as possessing "slave" status, but should be regarded as a free man, the court decided as follows (excerpt): "in the circuit courts of the united states, the record must show that the case is one in which by the constitution and laws of the united states, the court had jurisdiction--and if this does not appear, and the court gives judgment either for plaintiff or defendant, it is error, and the judgment must be reversed by this court--and the parties cannot by consent waive the objection to the jurisdiction of the circuit court. a free negro of the african race, whose ancestors were brought to this country and sold as slaves, is not a 'citizen' within the meaning of the constitution of the united states. when the constitution was adopted, they were not regarded in any of the states as members of the community which constituted the state, and were not numbered among its 'people or citizen.' consequently, the special rights and immunities guarantied to citizens do not apply to them. and not being "citizens" within the meaning of the constitution, they are not entitled to sue in that character in a court of the united states, and the circuit court has not jurisdiction in such a suit. the only two clauses in the constitution which point to this race, treat them as persons whom it was morally lawful to deal in as articles of property and to hold as slaves. since the adoption of the constitution of the united states, no state can by any subsequent law make a foreigner or any other description of persons citizens of the united states, nor entitle them to the rights and privileges secured to citizens by that instrument." why does the court say that the petitioning party in this case had no right to sue for his freedom? a) because he is too young b) because he is from a different state c) because he is "of the african race" with enslaved ancestors d) because he is, properly speaking, within his owner's jurisdiction
Answers: 1
question
History, 21.06.2019 20:00
Robert morris proposed a 10 percent tax on imported goods to pay the national debt. true or false
Answers: 1
question
History, 22.06.2019 10:00
The people are the source for any and all governmental power in the united states
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
Directions: match the ending sentence to the beginning sentences. copy the ending sentence and past...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 16.11.2020 20:20
question
English, 16.11.2020 20:20
Questions on the website: 13722360