Which of the following shows a difference between most state constitutions and the u. s. constitution?
state constitutions are more detailed and specific than the u. s. constitution.
state constitutions make following the u. s. constitution optional.
• only the u. s. constitution focuses on the personal rights of citizens.
only state constitutions describe how the judiciary system works.

state constitutions are more detailed and specific than the U.S. Constitution.

State constitutions are more detailed and specific than the U.S constitution

Explanation:

The Constitution of the Federal government and the state government outlines the different structures of the government which are the Legislative, Judiciary and Executive arms of the government and their respective functions and limitations as well. but

The state constitutions are relatively longer and more detailed than the U.S constitution because the U.S constitution contains/gives room for implied powers which are not explicitly stated in the constitution while every role of the arms of the state government is clearly stated even the limitation of powers are clearly stated more in the state constitutions.

although the crusades failed to capture jerusalem, they had several major impacts on western europe. they increased the authority of the king: sometimes nobles died in battle without leaving an heir in which case the king got their land. kings passed taxes to pay for the crusades.

i'll write a docs for you. hold on for a moment