The monroe doctrine could have been considered a huge gamble for the u. s. because they would have likely been unable to prevent which of these? a civil war an economic collapse trade embargoes with china europe's invasion of latin america

Europe's Invasion of Latin America.

Explanation:

The Monroe doctrine advocated for the existence of two separate spheres of influences: Europe, where the United States would not get involve, and the Americas, where European Powers should not get involved.

When the Monroe Doctrine was formulated by president James Monroe in 1823, the United States did not have a powerful navy yet, and for years, it was the British Empire the sole enforcer of the doctrine. Had the great European powers of the time decided to invade the Americas, the United States would not likely have prevented it.

the answer is the government.

alliances in ww1 were different from ww2 because the entente in ww1 made up of serbia,russia,france,britan,japan and italy later america  and all allied in a sort of balance of power and too keep germany,austria-hungary,and the ottomans down. russia allied the serbians in order to exert its influence in the balkans while france allied the russians because france was still in dismay and insulted after the defeat to the germans during the unification of germany and britian allied the belgians after the germans invasion of belgium.in ww2 the alliances were in a preemptive attempt to deter any further wars into happening while germany and italy allied since they were insulted and humiliated after the previous war while also sharing a similar ideology of facsim along with japan which all 3 had a want for world domination and agreed to assist one another in the endevours 

explanation: