Short answer YES
Explanation:
Because law by its very nature concerns moral judgments, a government that stands under the rule of law presupposes the existence of a moral order, expresses the social concept of that order, and in turn encourages the fundamental moral principles of a society, particularly regarding justice. Sustaining limited government and freedom turns on the question of how virtue is cultivated and which communities and institutions are most appropriate for this task.Such a shift in the public's attitude toward expansive government can weaken democracy, given that diversification of authority among local associations is a strong check against government tyrannyAll political communities, including nation-states, are held together by civic bonds or "ties that bind." As the motto of the United States-e pluribus unum,or "out of many, one" -implies, the kinds of obligations that unite its many members into one people are of critical importance. These bonds often take the form of moral obligations that we owe one another as members of the same community.National governments do not, for example, attract citizens to the good of compassion with the same power as other social institutions because they bind citizens to a sovereign state, or to an impersonal law, rather than to other citizens directly. desires to bind its "many" into "one" to limit its power and its purse, leaving primary responsibility for moral formation in the hands of local moral communities. Only these associations and institutions can foster true justice and compassion for those in need-a fact that makes them essential for the cultivation of virtuous citizens and the prevention of governmental tyranny.
