Ihave an essay about the the four early river valley civilizations its called the early river civilization these are the instructions 1. paragraph 1 introduction that includes the thesis statement 2. paragraph 2 compare the four the four early valley civilizations 3. paragraph 3 contrast the four early river valley civilizations 4. paragraph 4 conclusion that summarizes the major ideas and restates the thesis. somebody me

Civilization is basically a vital kind of grouping. Without civilizations, the world as we know it would not be. Civilizations have different qualities than regular groups of people such as nomads. For example, a civilization develops surpluses of things which helps the people be a stable community. These surpluses also create the construction and growth of cities and helps develop secure, formal states. Government is also present in civilizations. One very important part of a civilization is an advanced writing method. A civilization can only be complete with all of these factors, or it will just fall apart.

            Nomads are nowhere close to being a civilization even though sometimes groups of nomads have good technology. Nomads travel around all the time following food. A civilization is a stationary place with agriculture. This means that the community of people occupying this civilization does not have to go running around scrounging for food. Nomads are just a small group of people without cities, sometimes without writing, no organizations, and their technology is lacking. Civilizations have the one-up on nomads without a doubt. If everyone was just a bunch of nomads, the world would not be organized, and cultures would not be as complex and great as they are today. Nomads are just a bunch of underdeveloped, not modern, and sometimes barbaric people.

            The Greeks and the Romans both thought of themselves as a civilization separate from everyone else. The Greeks believed that anyone who could not speak Greek were barbarians meaning "those who cannot speak Greek." Anyone that could not speak Greek were only speaking "gibberish" to the Greeks so they separated themselves from others making themselves their own civilization. Just like the Greeks, the Romans believed they were different than others too, and the Romans coined the word civilization which was derived from the Latin Of course, the concept of Spengler is too radical to review aspects of interaction of culture and civilization. Real their relationship is, of course, much more complicated. Civilization, in the first place, and there may be only on the basis of certain cultural achievements, in this sense, it really appears virtually identical culture. But at the same time it differs from culture as their functions and target orientation. Does not coincide with the culture, civilization is an important stimulus for socio-historical form of culture. The interests of culture and civilization, and indeed may oppose each other, and such periods have been observed in human history.  

Anyway, culture and civilization appear in two different sides of human social and historical existence, and their opposition, but also the mutual stimulation are normal.  

Today the concept of “civilization” is often used to determine the achieved level of social development, as well as a certain level of functioning of culture in all its components. In other words: civilization – is a level of state and society, which are inherent in the high rise of culture and its effective functioning of all branches of life of society.

Explanation:

monitor contract compliance and results of forestry activities to assure adherence to government regulations.  

can i have brainlest

i think you may have asked this twice, but i answered one of the