subject
History, 17.12.2019 03:31 ashiteru123

Why did constitutional monarchy develop in england while absolute monarchy continued in russia?

russia was less economically developed than england and relied on a strong monarch to address the nation's issues.
russian monarchs like peter the great increased the power of the nobility, while english monarchs like elizabeth i refused to consult with the english parliament.
russian monarchs deeply resented the intrusion of religious authorities into affairs of state, while english monarchs believed they owed allegiance to the head of the church.
russia thrived economically under absolute monarchs, while england relied on parliament to rebuild after the english civil war.

ansver
Answers: 3

Another question on History

question
History, 21.06.2019 12:30
Which statement below would be the strongest evidence for the historians view
Answers: 3
question
History, 21.06.2019 20:40
Is karma the same as destiny, in the sense that everything that happens to you is predetermined? do you believe that "what goes around comes around," and if so is this the same as karma? does everyone get what they deserve, in the end?
Answers: 3
question
History, 22.06.2019 01:00
He three-fifths compromise, which was made at the constitutional convention, represented differences of opinions over which issues?
Answers: 1
question
History, 22.06.2019 04:00
Concerns about the environment prompt congress to pass a $1 surcharge tax on each gallon of gasoline. which statement best describes the impact of such a tax
Answers: 2
You know the right answer?
Why did constitutional monarchy develop in england while absolute monarchy continued in russia?
Questions
question
History, 08.12.2020 23:30
question
Mathematics, 08.12.2020 23:30
question
Mathematics, 08.12.2020 23:30
Questions on the website: 13722363