subject
History, 17.12.2019 12:31 Areyano8299

In the case randall v. sorrell (2006), supreme court justice stephen breyer argued that following judicial precedent
"avoids the instability and unfairness that accompany disruption of settled legal expectations. for this reason, the rule of
law demands that adhering to our prior case law be the norm. departure from precedent is exceptional and requires
special justification."
justice breyer is referring to which of the following legal principles?

ansver
Answers: 3

Another question on History

question
History, 21.06.2019 18:00
Me < 3 there are multiple ‘3rd party’ political parties in the us. what are the benefits of having 3rd parties? what are the disadvantages of being a member of one? would the u.s. benefit if there were more 3rd parties created, more support for the current ones, or would it be best to get rid of them altogether? why?
Answers: 2
question
History, 21.06.2019 20:30
What actions did americans take to show their patriotism after pearl harbor?
Answers: 1
question
History, 22.06.2019 00:30
What is the definition of evolution
Answers: 1
question
History, 22.06.2019 06:00
Complete this history worksheet . answer as many questions as you can.
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
In the case randall v. sorrell (2006), supreme court justice stephen breyer argued that following ju...
Questions
question
English, 26.07.2019 17:30
question
History, 26.07.2019 17:30
Questions on the website: 13722367