In new york v. quarles (1983), the supreme court ruled that miranda rights do not have to be read if a suspecta. already has a criminal record. b. puts public safety at immediate risk. c. looks as if he or she has just committed a crime. d. is someone the arresting officer already knows.

The correct answer is option is b: " Puts public safety at immediate risk".

Explanation:

In this supreme court ruling there is an exception of the person not being read their Miranda rights in case that they are a dangeour to themselves or others.

d) eastern business owners and former federalists

it was bribing i think i might be wrong though