From 2000 to 2012 the u. s. had a trade

a. surplus and a large net capital inflow.
b. surplus and a large net capital outflow.
c. deficit and a large net capital inflow.
d. deficit and a large net capital outflow.

When the cost of the nation's imports exceeds its exports over certain period of time, the situation is called "trade deficit"; during that period from 2000 to 2012 the US National saving decreased and the US Dollar overly flowed out to foreign markets, but foreign investments into US governments bonds increased which also made the country to have large net capital inflow. Thereby the answer would be c):

"The U.S. had a trade deficit and a large net capital inflow."

hello there!

the graphics that you have attached within the question, indicates that few people in bolivia work in industry according to its labor force.

however, the graphic that is on the right side of the picture shows the gdp sector in bolivia. this gross domestic product is a macroeconomic magnitude   that shows the monetary value of all finished goods and services within a country's borders in a specific time period. in this case, the graphic is showing the monetary value in each sector -agriculture, industry and services- of bolivia in 2012.

so, although the first graphic located at the left side indicates that not so many people work in industry, this is the second most important sector according to the gdp metrics because of the monetary value that impacts on its country. it does not need to be the most valuable one. if it makes an impact on the country's economy, it will be definitely crucial to it.

it was certainly a debatable decision, mainly because it was based primarily on political - and not on legal or social - views. since the congress at that time was led by members of the republican party, and the territory that the tribes wanted to turn into an exclusively indian state was predominantly democratic, the proposal (as expressed in the constitution) did not succeed, but the constitution itself proved to be of crucial importance in the creation of the state of oklahoma, and, most importantly, it guaranteed the involvement of representatives of the indian tribes in the government of the future joint state.  

as a member of congress, i would have voted to ratify the constitution, or at least to have it tabled. ignoring it was an interested and partial decision.