subject
History, 02.01.2020 21:31 Jasten

Which statement best explains why the colonists were angry about the stamp act?

ansver
Answers: 2

Another question on History

question
History, 21.06.2019 19:30
In the decision for dred scott vs.sanford, (1857) in which a slave petitioned for his freedom in a st. louis court, on the grounds that his owner had taken him into free territory, and thus he ought no longer be regarded as possessing "slave" status, but should be regarded as a free man, the court decided as follows (excerpt): "in the circuit courts of the united states, the record must show that the case is one in which by the constitution and laws of the united states, the court had jurisdiction--and if this does not appear, and the court gives judgment either for plaintiff or defendant, it is error, and the judgment must be reversed by this court--and the parties cannot by consent waive the objection to the jurisdiction of the circuit court. a free negro of the african race, whose ancestors were brought to this country and sold as slaves, is not a 'citizen' within the meaning of the constitution of the united states. when the constitution was adopted, they were not regarded in any of the states as members of the community which constituted the state, and were not numbered among its 'people or citizen.' consequently, the special rights and immunities guarantied to citizens do not apply to them. and not being "citizens" within the meaning of the constitution, they are not entitled to sue in that character in a court of the united states, and the circuit court has not jurisdiction in such a suit. the only two clauses in the constitution which point to this race, treat them as persons whom it was morally lawful to deal in as articles of property and to hold as slaves. since the adoption of the constitution of the united states, no state can by any subsequent law make a foreigner or any other description of persons citizens of the united states, nor entitle them to the rights and privileges secured to citizens by that instrument." why does the court say that the petitioning party in this case had no right to sue for his freedom? a) because he is too young b) because he is from a different state c) because he is "of the african race" with enslaved ancestors d) because he is, properly speaking, within his owner's jurisdiction
Answers: 1
question
History, 22.06.2019 04:30
Pls quickly! which of the following statements about spanish plantations is not accurate? a. spanish plantation screw sugarcane for export to spain. b. the spanish had a little concern for the lives of the indians who worked on the plantations. c. spanish presentation grew a wide variety of crops and sent the produce to many different european countries. d. to replace the native americans our dying off the spanish important african slaves.
Answers: 2
question
History, 22.06.2019 16:50
What possible disadvantage of interest groups does this scenario illustrate
Answers: 2
question
History, 22.06.2019 17:00
The zhou dynasty ended in a) mongol expansion. b) religious expansion. c) the invasion of the shang. d) wars and political upheaval.
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
Which statement best explains why the colonists were angry about the stamp act?...
Questions
question
English, 30.10.2021 03:20
question
Mathematics, 30.10.2021 03:20
question
Mathematics, 30.10.2021 03:20
question
Mathematics, 30.10.2021 03:20
Questions on the website: 13722363