You know, one thing that i thought made castillo's memoir so incredibly engaging was that it jumped straight into the middle of the action—the thirsty crew, the mysterious new land full of danger. tyler, why don't you consider shortening your beginning so that you get to the main event a little more quickly?

post your planning document to the discussion board, and identify two areas that you would like feedback on. some examples: is my event clearly stated? have i included too much or too little about the setting? do my beginning and middle fit together well?
read your classmates' planning documents, and provide constructive feedback explaining how they can improve their plans.

the picture is not clear

explanation:

in his book, the riddle of the rosetta stone, james giblin talks about how there was a young british polymath and physician named thomas young who made a lot of advances on the deciphering of the rosetta stone. he says that even though young made a lot of mistakes because he was working under false assumptions, he also made huge contributions like deciphering three out of the seven symbols (more than anyone else before him). young published his findings and continued his good work but he wasn't able to progress much further due to some unfavorable situations, he still laid the basis for many other scholars and of course for the man who has been generally known to have deciphered it, jean-françois champollion

eiffel tower

explanation:

i think 3 documents.

hope i

-lavira: )