Why did the united nations declare that the atrocities in darfur were not
genocide?

a. because the type of human rights violations that occurred were
not listed in the un's definition of genocide.

b. because the sudanese government focused on people of only one
ethnic group

c. because the number of casualties didn't add up to the required
number to be considered genocide.

d. because the sudanese government focused on rebels in general,
not a specific ethnic group.

B.

Explanation:

The UN did not describe the conflict in the Darfur Region as a genocide because the explicit instructions given to the military units by the Sudanese government appointed to eliminate the rebels, but they did not specify that a specific ethnicity has to be attacked. Anyway, even tough it has not been explicit the UN admits that quite possibly the attacks were intentionally performed against certain sectors of the civilian population.

In any case, the UN acknowledges the seriousness of the crimes committed, considered to be crimes against humanity, but states that the term genocide cannot not be used until each case is investigated and analyzed individually by judicial procedures.

The correct answer is: “Because the Sudanese government focused on rebels in general, not a specific ethnic group.”

Here is textual evidence from the study: The UN commission gave its reason: It decided that the Sudanese government’s intention was not to kill all non-Arab Sudanese peoples in Darfur but to stop the rebels.”

not really a history or a question at all.

explanation:

maybe this isn't the best place to ask this, maybe a social media platform like twitter or instagram? -austin