Explain the separation of the Seminoles from the Creeks and conclude with an explanation of why the Seminoles rejected the government's idea of rejoining the two tribes for removal.

The Seminoles, family members of the Creeks, and initially called the Oconee clan.They had been a part of the Creek Nation, which actually was an alliance. Oconee was just a single group of that alliance. The Seminoles moved south and cut off all links and associations with the Creek clans in Georgia and Alabama. They turned into a different clan with its own legislature and its own pioneers. By the mid nineteenth century, they even had separate decision powers. Florida was under the control of Spain, while Alabama and Georgia were the part of United States. Both had recently been controlled by England.

Explanation:

In the TREATY AT PAYNE'S LANDING In 1832,The Seminoles made their statement that a Scouting party of Seminoles would investigate the western land. After getting into west, the exploring party denied to like what they found over there. so the exploring party made agreement on the  Treaty of Fort Gibson, concurring that the Seminole clan would move to the western part of the Creek Nation.It has been proposed that the administration authorities of Government may have even compromised not to accompany the gathering back to Florida. Some Seminole heads professed to have thought to express that they had discovered the land acceptable.

The most critical point of the Treaty was that it changed the wording from the Payne's 94 Seminoles and Other Settlers Landing Treaty. The new Treaty demonstrated that only the exploring party needed to support of the new land, not most of the clan.  

At that point when the Seminoles in Florida came to know about the new Treaty, they rejected it. They considered the Payne's Landing Treaty void, and they considered the Treaty of Camp Moultrie viable until 1843.

i would have to say i believe that it is a.