subject
History, 24.02.2020 18:53 beccastark1733

Officer Mendez arrives on the scene after receiving a call of an aggravated robbery. Officer Mendez sees two men who fit the description of the robbers, Jake and Brian, walking down the street. Officer Mendez details then and pats down the outer clothing of the two alleged suspects with the intent to remove any possible weapons for the safety of the officer but finds a bag of marijuana on both suspects. However, the two suspects do not have any evidence of the robbery nor do they have any weapons. Officer Mendez arrests both Jake and Brian for the possession of marijuana. Jake and Brian argue the marijuana should be suppressed, claiming it was obtained through an illegal search by Officer Mendez. Which of the following precedents shall Officer Mendez use in court to refute Jake and Brian's argument? * Brinegar v. United States (1949) Terry v. Ohio (1968) Mapp v. Ohio (1961) Weeks v. United States (1914)

ansver
Answers: 1

Another question on History

question
History, 21.06.2019 14:30
1: how did the rise of rulers with total power in europe and asia lead to world war 2?
Answers: 1
question
History, 21.06.2019 21:10
The system of checks and balances ensures that
Answers: 1
question
History, 22.06.2019 00:00
Which german count invented the zeppelin
Answers: 2
question
History, 22.06.2019 02:00
Which choice describes some of the difficulties john adams faced as presiden
Answers: 3
You know the right answer?
Officer Mendez arrives on the scene after receiving a call of an aggravated robbery. Officer Mendez...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 09.12.2020 19:10
question
Biology, 09.12.2020 19:10
Questions on the website: 13722363