Match the causes of the revolMatch the causes of the revolution in Romania with their effects. ution in Romania with their effects.

Romania revolution started in December in 1989 and led to the execution of general of communist party Nicolae.

Explanation:

The Romanian Revolution was a time of brutal common agitation in Romania during December 1989 as a piece of the Revolutions of 1989 that happened in a few nations.

The Romanian Revolution began in the city of Timișoara and before long spread all through the nation, at last coming full circle in the show preliminary and execution of long-term Communist Party General Secretary Nicolae Ceaușescu and his significant other Elena, and the finish of 42 years of Communist principle in Romania.

The Romanian revolution in 1989 was carried out in December 1989. It began with a demonstration in Timisoara in protest of the regime's attempt to sabotage the free-standing pastor Laszlo Tokes, who belonged to the Hungarian minority in the country.  

The protesters were shot and more than 70 were killed. The turmoil spread to other cities, including Bucharest, where Nicolae Ceausescu was buzzing during a mass meeting he himself called in until December 21, 1989 outside the building of the Central Committee.

On December 22, 1989, protesters stormed during a new mass meeting at  the Central Committee and Ceausescu and his wife had to escape by helicopter. On the same day, the Nationalist Liberation Front founded a new provisional government. Ion Iliescu was President and Petre Roman was Prime Minister.  In the days following, fighting broke out between the secret police Securitate for several days in Bucharest. Over a thousand people lost their lives in the fighting, in addition to the 70 in Timisoara.

isolationism is a doctrine practiced by the united states for much of its history with the aim of not intervening in external affairs that did not pose a real threat to their country. the united states managed to maintain a state of political isolation throughout the nineteenth century and the first part of the xx. few nations have been able to maintain such a position for such a long period of time. historians argue that it is largely due to geographical reasons, given the physical distance between europe and the usa. uu the venataja of this situation is that the national state can spend its resources in satisfying all the needs of its inhabitants, without the need to invest in armament and equipment for a war that does not directly affect the country.

internationalism is a political and cultural movement that advocates for greater political and economic cooperation among nations for mutual benefit. this novimiento was transformed over time, today it includes military intervention in international conflicts with the objective of maintaining peace. the advantage of this move is in the international contacts and the influence developed by the country that carries it forward.

between the two modes of relations between states, i prefer the first, since i believe it is of the utmost importance to satisfy the needs of citizens and work for their development and as a last option to act on the international level.

do you have a list of sources to choose from?