How do Jackson's references to Thurgood Marshall's victory in the Supreme Court decision Brown V. Board of education and the civil rights act of 1964 strengthen his argument

Brown V Board strengthen his argument because segregation had already been won in 1954 it was cornerstone of the civil rights movement. It stated that segregation had no place in the Americans society.

Explanation: Marshall was the Court's first African-American justice. Before his judicial service, he successfully argued several cases before the Supreme Court, including Brown v. Board of Education and played an important role in promoting racial equality.

The Civil Rights Act of 1964 was the most comprehensive civil rights legislation that enacted by Congress. It consisted of extensive measures to dismantle Jim Crow segregation and inhibit racial discrimination.

There was considerable resistance to the Supreme Court's ruling in Brown v. Board of Education. In addition to the obvious disapproving segregationists were some constitutional scholars who felt that the decision went against legal tradition by relying heavily on data presented by social scientists rather than established law. People who support restriction of the judicial system felt that the Court had overstepped its constitutional powers by writing new law.

goof d geieuiuhfwehguwrhgu8uooiihvurg[

the punishment for breaking the law would depend on the conditions or the seriousness of the law being broken, if he or she breaks the law while doing some great discovery or invention then it would classify as a scientific fraud. there are other words to describe the crime but scientific fraud would be the harshest one.