subject
History, 27.02.2020 20:24 Rodny1047

How did the Supreme Court majority argue that "separate but equal" facilities were legal? Check all that
apply.
It was said to help preserve the peace and public order.
It was not really enforced on a day-to-day basis.
It allegedly affected only people with a criminal record.
The Constitution did not protect social rights, only civil and political rights.

ansver
Answers: 2

Another question on History

question
History, 22.06.2019 02:00
Abody of water that is surrounded by land on three sides and leads to a larger body of water is called
Answers: 1
question
History, 22.06.2019 10:30
Georgia experienced its worst recorded drought during 1930 and 1931. what conclusion can you make as to how the drought affected georgia?
Answers: 1
question
History, 22.06.2019 10:50
I'd be super appreciative if someone could me out here! discuss the the following question: how influential were the three philosophers? why? (the three philosophers are locke, hobbes, and montesquieu)
Answers: 1
question
History, 22.06.2019 15:00
What was the combined affect of the indian removal act and the trail of tears
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
How did the Supreme Court majority argue that "separate but equal" facilities were legal? Check all...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 06.12.2019 17:31
question
Geography, 06.12.2019 17:31
question
English, 06.12.2019 17:31
Questions on the website: 13722363