1. What can be learned from Graffam's letter about the motives of those who attacked the Armenians? 2. What evidence does the letter provide about the ways different groups of Armenians were treated?3. The author is uncertain about the government's responsibility for ordering the massacres. What experiences did she have that help explain her uncertainty?4. What do you make of the efforts of government officials to separate Graffam from the Armenian deportees? How does your answer relate to the issue raised in question 3?

haha! : )

nice one lol

payments were made after the 1940s.

in the 1980s, a commission held investigations and made recommendations.

roosevelt believed that in light of the country's recent military successes, it was unnecessary to use force to achieve foreign policy goals, so long as the military could threaten force. this belief, and his strategy of “speaking softly and carrying a big stick,” shaped much of roosevelt's foreign policy.

the quote by walter cronkite contributes to the central idea of the text by supporting the central idea. cronkite argues that what is deemed “right” for and in america may not be good for other countries. this supports the central idea of the text, that the vietnam war was unpopular in america for multiple reasons- including cronkite’s.