Suppose you have read two different books of world war two and each book has different arguments about how the war started which of the following sources provides the best support for the author arguments?

answer:

c

Explanation:

Primary sources are crucial to understanding history. it gives us a first-eye view into the lives of the people that actually lived durng the time and took part in the events

well that depends on how deep the hole is. you'd first go through te crust of the earth, then the upper mantle, then the lower mantle then the outer core, then the inner cor then you'd be stuck in the core to melt.

no options provided, here,but the answer to this question is often: a historian cites a japanese newspaper article published a year after the end of world war ii in order to draw conclusions about the effect of the war on the japanese economy.

clearly from the answer, the historian alludes to historical sources,and records to aid in analyzing and drawing conclusion on the effect of the war on the economy of japan.