Emily's experiment was clean, simple, and effective. Due to her parents' occupations in the medical field, she had wide access to people who claimed to be TT practitioners. Emily took 21 TT practitioners and used them for her science experiment. She would take a TT practitioner and ask them to extend their hands through a screen (which they can't see through). Emily would be on the other side and would flip a fair coin. Depending on how the coin landed, she would put out either her left hand or her right hand. The TT practitioner would then have to answer which hand Emily put out. If a pracitioner could truly interact with a person's HEF, it would be expected that they answered correctly. Overall, through 210 samples, the practitioner picked the correct hand 44% of the time. Emily's main goal here was to test whether or not the TT practicioners' guesses were random, like the flip of a coin. In most medical experiments, this is the norm. We want to test whether or not the treatment has an effect, not whether or not the treatment actually works. We will now begin to formulate this experiment in terms of the terminology we learned in this course. Question 1: Describe Emily’s model for how likely the TT practitioners are to choose the correct hand. What alternative model is her model meant to discredit?Question 2: Why is the statistic ''The absolute difference between the expected percent correct and the actual percent correct'' is the best choice for comparing outcomes in Emily's experiment? How does it relate to the models you defined in question 1?

Rule of law analysis template name:date: 
 read each scenario and answer the questions that follow. scenario 1 local law defines the speed limit as 45 miles per hour on local roads. the law outlines punishments by charging fines for those who drive faster than the speed limit. signs post this law on most roads. local police stop a man traveling 67 miles per hour. he apologizes and says he did not see a speed limit sign. the officer gave him a ticket and told him he will have to appear in court since he was going so fast. is this a matter of constitutional, criminal, civil, or military law? is the source of the law a statute, regulation, case law, or combination? determine the purpose of the law. is the law intended to protect people's safety or people's rights? use details from the lesson to support your answer. write in complete sentences.what could happen if the law did not exist? use details from the lesson, including the impact on government officials, to support your answer. write in complete sentences.scenario 2 state law recognizes that every vehicle has a title or legal document that names the owner of the vehicle. the state also recognizes financial agreements between people who have lent or borrowed money a woman decided to sell her car to her friend. her friend did not have enough money to pay for the car. the woman made a financial agreement with her friend. she agreed to accept payments until all the money for the car was paid. the woman gave the car title to her friend, with the friend now listed as the owner. her friend made no payments on the car. the woman wants her money or the car back. is this a matter of constitutional, criminal, civil, or military law? is the source of the law a statute, regulation, case law, or combination? determine the purpose of the law. is the law intended to protect people's safety or people's rights? use details from the lesson to support your answer. write in complete sentenceswhat could happen if the law did not exist? use details from the lesson, including the impact on government officials, to support your answer. write in complete sentences.scenario 3 federal law requires that news agencies not publish or broadcast information that could threaten the security of the. however, the constitution protects the right to free expression of ideas. judges use past decisions on cases where the law and rights come into conflict to settle similar disputes. a reporter for a national news program is accused of breaking the law. the reporter wrote an article that disapproves of a new federal policy. u.s. officials say the article is unfair and too negative. they say it could upset people and lead some to break laws in protest. the reporter says that news writers have the right to free expression under the constitution. the reporter also says that the article does not promote unlawful action. is this a matter of constitutional, criminal, civil, or military law? is the source of the law a statute, regulation, case law, or a combination? determine the purpose of the. is the law intended to protect people's safety or people's rights? use details from the lesson to support your answer. write in complete sentences.what could happen if the law did not exist? use details from the lesson, including the impact on government officials, to support your answer. write in complete sentences.