What change in the interpretation of the First Amendment does this timeline
reflect?
1914: World War I begins.
1917: Charles Schenck distributes pamphlets encouraging U. S. men to
resist serving in the military.
1919: The Supreme Court rules that Schenck's action is not protected
because it poses a "clear and present danger" to safety.
O
A. It shows an increasing willingness to restrict free speech during a
time of whar.
B. It shows pamphlets being restricted as a new form of
communication.
O
C. It shows that a majority of Americans began to oppose hateful
speech against members of the military.
D. It shows that the Supreme Court can suspend the Bill of Rights in
order to fight traitors.

NOW!

This excerpt demonstrates a character vs. self conflict because paul describes read the excerpt from the land. "cassie, you know 'bout mitchell? " i asked her. "course i know about mitchell," she answered. "why're you letting him beat up on you? " "i'm not letting himl" exclaimed in outrage. "you thinking i'm liking him beating up on me? " "well, if you're not, you'd better make him stop." "well, i'm trying." "well, you'd better try harder." "i've tried fighting back, but he's too strong. thing is, i don't know how to stop him." his personal struggle with how to handle mitchell. his struggle to get cassie to him with mitchell. his conversation with cassie about handling mitchell. his interactions with both cassie and mitchell. mark this and return save and exit next submit