(A) majority of the Court... believe that the petitioner has a substantial probability of success. The issue is not, as the dissent puts it, whether "[c]ounting every legally cast vote ca[n] constitute irreparable harm." One of the principal issues in the appeal we have accepted is precisely whether the votes that have been ordered to be counted are, under a reasonable interpretation of Florida law, "legally cast vote[s]." The counting of votes that are of questionable legality does in my view threaten irreparable harm to (the) petitioner..., and to the country, by casting a cloud upon what he claims to be the legitimacy of his election. Count first, and rule upon legality afterwards, is not a recipe for producing election results that have the public acceptance democratic stability requires."

- Associate Justice Antonin Scalia, December 9, 2000
This passage is from a Supreme Court decision that had an impact on
A) the right to vote.
B) the right to protest peacefully.
C) who would become President of the United States.
D) whether or not primary elections were Constitutional