As of 2015, no American president has used the word "genocide" to describe the events of 1915 because they don't want to upset turkey who is an important ally to the United States. is it more important for an individual to do what is"politically correct" or to do what might be morally right even if it might upset some people? is it different for a president? explain your answer.

your stuuupid lolz

explanation:

islamic religious leaders have traditionally been people who, as part of the clerisy, mosque, or government, performed a prominent role within their community or nation. however, in the modern contexts of muslims minorities in non-muslim countries as well as secularised muslim states like turkey, indonesia and bangladesh, religious leadership may take a variety of non-formal shapes.

compared to religious leaders/clerics of the other abrahamic faiths, islamic clergy are said to resemble rabbis and not priests. unlike catholic priests they do not "serve as intermediaries between mankind and god",[1] have "process of ordination",[2] or "sacramental functions",[1] but instead serve as "exemplars, teachers, judges, and community leaders," providing religious rules to the pious on "even the most minor and private" matters.[1]