subject
History, 24.03.2020 01:22 mari200150

We heard President Roosevelt describe the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor as “a day that will live in infamy.” Infamy means disgrace, dishonor, or great wickedness. What do you think were the various emotions of Americans in the first hours and days after they heard the news of the attack?

ansver
Answers: 3

Another question on History

question
History, 21.06.2019 19:30
In the decision for dred scott vs.sanford, (1857) in which a slave petitioned for his freedom in a st. louis court, on the grounds that his owner had taken him into free territory, and thus he ought no longer be regarded as possessing "slave" status, but should be regarded as a free man, the court decided as follows (excerpt): "in the circuit courts of the united states, the record must show that the case is one in which by the constitution and laws of the united states, the court had jurisdiction--and if this does not appear, and the court gives judgment either for plaintiff or defendant, it is error, and the judgment must be reversed by this court--and the parties cannot by consent waive the objection to the jurisdiction of the circuit court. a free negro of the african race, whose ancestors were brought to this country and sold as slaves, is not a 'citizen' within the meaning of the constitution of the united states. when the constitution was adopted, they were not regarded in any of the states as members of the community which constituted the state, and were not numbered among its 'people or citizen.' consequently, the special rights and immunities guarantied to citizens do not apply to them. and not being "citizens" within the meaning of the constitution, they are not entitled to sue in that character in a court of the united states, and the circuit court has not jurisdiction in such a suit. the only two clauses in the constitution which point to this race, treat them as persons whom it was morally lawful to deal in as articles of property and to hold as slaves. since the adoption of the constitution of the united states, no state can by any subsequent law make a foreigner or any other description of persons citizens of the united states, nor entitle them to the rights and privileges secured to citizens by that instrument." why does the court say that the petitioning party in this case had no right to sue for his freedom? a) because he is too young b) because he is from a different state c) because he is "of the african race" with enslaved ancestors d) because he is, properly speaking, within his owner's jurisdiction
Answers: 1
question
History, 21.06.2019 20:00
How do you think germans felt in the postwar years? check any boxes that you agree with they may have been angry about paying high taxes and high prices they may have blamed the allied nations for their money troubles they may have wished that germany had a strong leader to stand up for them they may have resented people who had a lot of money done
Answers: 1
question
History, 21.06.2019 21:00
Why does benjamin martin eventually join the continental army
Answers: 1
question
History, 22.06.2019 01:30
List a few examples of city-states that practiced oligarchy in ancient greece
Answers: 3
You know the right answer?
We heard President Roosevelt describe the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor as “a day that will live i...
Questions
question
Arts, 25.04.2021 05:50
question
French, 25.04.2021 05:50
question
Physics, 25.04.2021 05:50
Questions on the website: 13722367