The government can stop a public protest of its policies if .
the protest is unpopular
the protest is on public property
the demonstrators endanger public safety
the demonstrators face counterdemonstrators

The government can stop a public protest of its policies if the demonstrators endanger public safety.

Option: C

Explanation:

If public are unsatisfied with the performance of Government in any perspective than they can make a group and agitate against them. Its their right to say their demands before government. But it should be in peaceful way so it can not hamper other's interest or property.

If a public protest is disturbing others and destroying public safety then it would be restricted at any cost. For that government can take serious steps to prevent the agitation.

confederacy: supported slavery, believed states should be able to nullify federal laws, supported low tariffs

union: everything else

the vast majority of ballots have been counted nearly two weeks after one of the biggest political upsets in modern u.s. history catapulted donald trump to the presidency.

estimates show more than 58 percent of eligible voters went to the polls during the 2016 election, nearly breaking even with the turnout rate set during the last presidential election in 2012, even as the final tallies in states like california continue to be calculated, according to statistics collected by the u.s. elections project.

but among those figures were stark contrasts in key states that swing the election to trump — in ohio, wisconsin, iowa, michigan and elsewhere — indicating the president-elect’s leap from long-shot candidate to the most powerful political position in the world may have happened in part because of apathy toward hillary clinton’s candidacy, especially among the democratic base, several political scientists and organizations monitoring voter turnout told the pbs newshour.

while clinton is leading the popular vote by more than 1.5 million over trump as of sunday, she trails president obama’s 2012 totals by more than 2 million ballots — a chasm that may have cost her the election, said david becker, co-founder of the center for election and innovation and research.

“several million voters didn’t come out to vote,” becker said. “which is telling me that this idea of the trump wave, a huge number of voters shifting over to trump, is certainly not the story.”