Whose goals does this declaration represent?
The following declaration has been approved to form
interim governmental authorities broadly representative
of all democratic elements in the population and pledged
to the earliest possible establishment through free
elections of governments responsive to the will of the
people.
-Declaration on Liberated Europe,
February 11, 1945
Britain and Japan's
Russia and Japan's
o Germany and the United States'
O Britain and the United States'

confucius was a great thinker and teacher, and philosopher succeeded in laying the foundations beloved.

he many principles but waht   was speak about the relationships was the third .

the third important concept , the real man's idea. he is the man who lives up to the highest moral standards. man shows five virtues: in self, generosity, sincerity, perseverance, and benevolence. his relationship is described as follows: when a son is always loyal, as a father is just and gentle, as an administrator is loyal and loyal, and as a husband is honest and fair, and as a friend, he is faithful and languid. if everything is a true happiness conference, justice and harmony will rule the empire.

i'm free to do it

explanation:

in the united states, the president is controlled by the

constitution, and in all respects subordinate to it. insofar

as it deals with presidential power, however, the american

constitution has proved to be a highly malleable document.

with very few exceptions,' the constitutional provisions relating to the president have not been changed at all since

they were ratified in 1787. but in the late twentieth century, those provisions do not mean what they meant in

1787. the constitution is a legal document, and it is enforced judicially; but its meaning was hardly fixed when it

was ratified. in particular, the contemporary president has

far broader powers than the original constitution contemplated. it is remarkable but true that large-scale changes in

the authority of the president have been brought about

without changes in the constitutional text, but nevertheless

without significant illegality.

this is a paradox. is it not clear that constitutional

changes, if not textual, are illegal? the paradox has considerable relevance to our current thinking about the presidency in particular and about constitutionalism in general.

perhaps the framers of the american constitution feared

legislative power most of all; 2 but from well-known events

in the twentieth century, it is possible to conclude that it is

presidential power that holds out the greatest risks to both

liberty and democracy. the president is by far the most visible leader in the nation; he is often the only person in government with a national constituency. moreover, he is

this is a good question! i'll do some research and come back when i have the answer!