Which of the following statements about the period of time known as Reconstruction is FALSE? Group of answer choices It ended in the 1950s/1960s when the Supreme Court decided Brown v. Board of Education and Congress passed the Civil Rights Act and Voting Rights Act. It lasted for about 12 years following the Civil War. During this time, Southern states were closely monitored by Northern troops due to fears that Southern states would seek to punish or retaliate against newly freed slaves. During this time, former slaves enjoyed previously unprecedented freedoms, including the right to vote, work, own property, and serve in elected office.

It ended in the 1950s/1960s when the Supreme Court decided Brown v. Board of Education and Congress passed the Civil Rights Act and Voting Rights Act.

Explanation:

The Reconstruction period is usually considered to have lasted roughly between 1865 and 1877. During these years, the country recovered from the damage of the war. However, one of the most important events during this period was the fact that former slaves were able to enjoy citizenship rights that they had not enjoyed before. Nevertheless, this progress was slowed down by the reluctance of certain groups, mainly white groups in the South who did not agree with integration or equality.

ans wer:

explanation:

b) a state law could be declared illegal if it contradicted the constitution.

explanation:

the conflict of this case originated when james w. mcculloch, a cashier of the baltimore branch of the second bank of the united states that the congress had chartered in 1816, refused to pay a tax imposed by the maryland state.

in the case, the state of maryland appealed that the establishment of a second bank was unconstitutional since the constitution didn't say anything about granting that power to congress. however, the case determined that even if such right wasn't specifically stated in the constitution, it was part of the "implied powers" of the government enunciated in article i, section 8.

the case also eliminated maryland's legislation to impose taxes to a national bank, asserting that even though the states retained the power of taxation, the constitution's laws are supreme and can not be controlled by the states, therefore, if a state law contradicts the constitution, it should be declared illegal.

explanation: