Which statement BEST explains the significance of the Tet Offensive?

A. United States and South Vietnamese troops were able to force the Vietcong to retreat to North Vietnam and Cambodia.

B. It's failure led to disagreements between the Vietcong and the government of North Vietnam.

C. It demonstrated the superiority of the United States forces over the Vietcong in South Vietnam.

D. It showed that the Vietcong could mount a successful attack on South Vietnamese and were not close to defeat despite what the US government
told the American people.

D. It showed that the Vietcong could mount a successful attack on South Vietnamese and were not close to defeat despite what the US government told the American people.

Explanation:

Despite the gigantic military U.S. deployment and buildup in Vietnam, the Vietnamese communist forces managed to surprise American  and allied South Vietnamese troops by launching an offensive in 100 cities in January/February 1968, the Tet Offensive; that was what America´s and the world´s eyes could see.

The offensive was a military setback for the Communists (they weren´t able to take and hold in one city), but it was a huge PR and image success that influenced the mood of the American public opinion. It showed the chaos and brutality of the war, its uncertainty; it was not clear the U.S. was winning the war, as American leaders wanted people to believe. It reinforced opposition to war and the pacifist movement in American cities.

Tet is the Vietnamese Lunar New Year.

abraham lincoln, according to anyone who was connected with agriculture, represented the worst of northern politicians. shortly after lincoln was elected, south carolina seceded from the union. they along with other southern states, retained their anger. in a way, it was their own fault: the democrats were split in the south. some wanted slavery to be extended in other states that were about to join the union and some didn't want it badly enough. lincoln had a solid backing from his party: the republicans were united in not wanting slavery to be expanded.

answer: alexander the great

explanation: