subject
History, 20.04.2020 04:18 kimmy6973

As a result of Miranda v. Arizona (1966), nothing suspects say can be used against them in court unless .
A.
two witnesses are present when they make their statement
B.
they have been advised of their rights
C.
the defense attorney gives permission for it to be used
D.
the suspect becomes violent with arresting officers

Please select the best answer from the choices provided

ansver
Answers: 2

Another question on History

question
History, 21.06.2019 23:30
Many people believe that was influenced by the panchatantra. aesop the romans buddha chandragupta ii
Answers: 3
question
History, 22.06.2019 02:00
How could a works-cited list a reader determine whether to believe the claims you make in an essay? a. by synthesizing your conclusions into a simple objective summary o b. by proving that your claims are supported with credible evidence ) c. by allowing you to make claims without quoting other writers o d. by providing a clear organizational structure to your essay
Answers: 3
question
History, 22.06.2019 04:30
What was different about religious practices in pennsylvania and massachusetts
Answers: 1
question
History, 22.06.2019 07:20
Two of these describe "federalism." (choose two answers) select one or more: a. the national government absolutely controls all state governments. b. power is shared by the national and state governments. c. state governments exercise absolute power over the national government. d. it is a compromise meant to eliminate the disadvantages of a "unitary" and a "confederate" system.
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
As a result of Miranda v. Arizona (1966), nothing suspects say can be used against them in court unl...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 04.02.2020 00:54
question
Mathematics, 04.02.2020 00:54
Questions on the website: 13722361